NYG · TE
Projected Points (PPR)
This week
No projection changes recorded this week.
AI-assisted · Researched and drafted by our automated pipeline, then checked for accuracy before publishing. How we make these
Theo Johnson enters this season as the second tight end on the New York Giants depth chart, behind Isaiah Likely, after finishing last season as the clear starter with fifteen games played and fifteen games started. That earlier workload was substantial: an 86.5% snap share, 74 targets, 45 receptions, 528 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns, good for 127.8 PPR points and a finish of eighteenth among all tight ends. Through three games this season, his snap share has fallen to 30.9%, and the target volume has collapsed alongside it — 5 targets, 1 reception, 9 receiving yards. The catch rate has dropped from 60.8% to 20%, and his points per game have fallen from 8.5 to 0.6. He now ranks seventy-ninth among tight ends in PPR scoring this season, a steep drop from last year's eighteenth-place finish. The offense around him is led by Jameis Winston at quarterback, with Malik Nabers as the primary receiving target and Cam Skattebo handling early-down work out of the backfield. None of those pieces were new acquisitions designed around Johnson, and the passing-game script now runs through Likely at tight end rather than through him. The red zone role he carried last season — 13 targets inside the twenty — has not materialized this season, at least not for him. Whatever playing-time split exists right now puts him clearly behind Likely on the depth chart, and the per-game numbers reflect a role that has shrunk dramatically rather than simply regressed from a strong prior season.
The case for Theo Johnson rests entirely on what he did a season ago, not on what the numbers say right now. Fifteen starts, an 86.5% snap share, 45 catches and 5 touchdowns are not the numbers of a fringe piece — they describe a tight end who was a full-time contributor in a modern passing offense, finishing eighteenth at the position in PPR scoring. If something shifts in New York and he reclaims snaps, the receiving profile from last season suggests he can still produce when given the opportunities: 11.7 yards per reception is a respectable mark for the position, and 13 red zone targets in a single season shows the coaching staff trusted him near the goal line at one point. That history matters more for him than for a player with no prior role to point to. The case against him is simply the current season's evidence, and it is hard to argue around. A 30.9% snap share is a backup's workload, not a starter's, and the five weeks of target data — 5 targets across three games, one catch, 9 yards — reflect a player who is no longer central to the passing game plan. Isaiah Likely now sits ahead of him on the depth chart, and Jameis Winston's targets at tight end appear to be flowing toward Likely rather than Johnson. A catch rate of 20% this season, down from 60.8%, is not just bad luck on a handful of targets; it is consistent with a player running routes in a diminished role where the quarterback is looking elsewhere first. The points-per-game crater, from 8.5 to 0.6, tells the same story from a different angle — this is not a talented player hitting a rough patch, it is a player who has been pushed down the depth chart in his own offense. The honest read is that last season's production was real, but it required a role he does not currently hold. Malik Nabers remains the clear top receiving option, Cam Skattebo anchors the run game, and none of that creates added opportunity at tight end. For Johnson to matter again this season, something would have to change in how the Giants distribute targets at the position, and there is no evidence yet that it is trending his way. Fantasy managers should weigh the proven ceiling against the current, unmistakable role reduction, and recognize that right now the role, not the talent, is the limiting factor.
Leave Theo Johnson on the wire in most leagues right now. The snap share and target numbers this season — 30.9% of snaps, 5 targets, 1 reception — describe a depth piece, not a streaming option, let alone someone to start. Even in deeper formats where tight end is thin, his current role does not support regular lineup use; there are other low-rostered tight ends getting more consistent volume on a weekly basis. In dynasty or keeper formats, a speculative stash can be justified purely on the strength of last season's fifteen-game sample, when he produced 127.8 PPR points as a full-time starter. That kind of track record is rare for a bench tight end, and it means he carries more long-term value than his current role suggests. But that stash should come with a short leash and realistic expectations about playing time. What would change the calculus is a tangible shift in snaps or targets — any sign that the Giants are moving work away from Isaiah Likely and back toward Johnson. Until the snap share climbs well above the 30.9% mark and the target total starts resembling last season's 74-target pace rather than this season's 5, there is no redraft case for rostering him in shallow or medium-depth leagues. Monitor the box score for snap counts and target share each week rather than acting on name value alone; the gap between last season's role and this season's role is simply too wide to paper over with optimism.
Projections, injury status and news above update automatically. This section is rewritten when his role changes. Browse every player
No recent news
Breaking news appears here within minutes of reporting