PHI · QB
Projected Points (PPR)
This week
▲ +13.7 ptsAI-assisted · Researched and drafted by our automated pipeline, then checked for accuracy before publishing. How we make these
Joe Milton sits behind Tanner McKee on the depth chart, with the two of them listed as the quarterback options in Philadelphia. Last season Milton saw the field for four games, and his workload tells the story of a backup pressed into brief action rather than any kind of expanded opportunity: 2.1% of the offense's snaps, 24 pass attempts, and 15 completions for 183 yards. He added a single passing touchdown against two interceptions, numbers that reflect a short, uneven sample rather than a sustained run as a starter. His 5 rush attempts for 50 yards hint at some mobility that could matter if he ever gets consistent snaps, but that total came in such a small window that it cannot be treated as an established rushing role. Right now he is a depth piece on a roster built around Saquon Barkley at running back and DeVonta Smith at wide receiver, with Dallas Goedert anchoring the tight end spot. None of that offensive investment is built around the quarterback room's backup, and Milton's current standing reflects that reality.
The case for Joe Milton starts with scarcity value in deep formats: a quarterback with any NFL path to snaps carries a baseline of lottery-ticket appeal, and his 50 rushing yards on just 5 attempts last season at least suggest some scrambling ability that could matter if he were ever handed a real workload. A single passing touchdown in four games is not nothing, and some fantasy managers like to roster a flier who might benefit from a sudden change in circumstances elsewhere on the roster. The case against him is considerably stronger. He played in four games and touched 2.1% of the offense's snaps, which is about as clear a signal as the sport provides that he was not viewed as a plan A. His completion rate of 62.5% on just 24 attempts is too small a sample to extrapolate into anything meaningful, and the two interceptions against one touchdown is a bad ratio even accounting for the tiny sample. His 12.32 PPR points over the season, or 3.1 per game, placed him 57th among players at his position for the year — production that would not sustain a bench spot on almost any roster, redraft or dynasty. The surrounding offense, with DeVonta Smith as the established receiving target and Saquon Barkley drawing touches on the ground, is built to funnel volume to the starter under center, not the backup. Unless an unforeseen change opens a path to snaps, there is no version of this offense where Milton's role expands organically. The honest read is that his statistical profile is thin because his opportunity was thin, and nothing in the current depth chart suggests that changes.
Leave Joe Milton on the wire in essentially every format. His 3.1 points per game and a 57th-place finish among players at his position make him unusable even as a desperation streamer, and his 2.1% snap share last season shows he was never positioned for consistent work. In superflex or deep dynasty leagues where teams stash every rostered quarterback, there is a thin argument for holding him as a depth add, but even there he should not occupy a bench spot ahead of players with clearer paths to snaps. There is nothing here to start, flex, or trade for. What would change the calculus is a shift in Philadelphia's depth chart that hands him the job outright and sustains it across multiple games — at that point his rushing ability, hinted at by the 50 yards on 5 carries, would become worth re-evaluating. Until then, treat him as unrostered in single-quarterback leagues and a low-priority stash at best in formats that demand quarterback depth.
Projections, injury status and news above update automatically. This section is rewritten when his role changes. Browse every player
Joe Milton has been named Philadelphia’s starting quarterback, replacing Tanner McKee for the upcoming game against the Giants.